SGVJOURNAL, West Valley Journal, Monterey Park News

Switch to desktop

No Turning Back Damaging Environmental Impacts of Bioengineered Foods

  • By LEED GA, Charlene on Green
Considering the potential risks associated with the introduction of new biotech crop varieties, consideration must be given to the risks associated with not using biotechnology to achieve desired goals. www.charleneongreen.org

The objective of environmental safety assessment is to identify and evaluate any additional risks associated with the release and cultivation of these new plants in comparison with a conventional crop variety that has a history of safe use.

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY Assessing the environmental safety of a biotech plant requires an understanding of the biology of the plant itself and the practices used in it s cultivation. This knowledge is important in identifying and evaluating potential environ mental risk s and also in designing any appropriate risk management measures. Most countries use similar environmental risk assessment approaches, which include:

Evaluating the role of the introduced gene in the plant and any changes in the plant's characteristics
The possible unintended secondary effects on non-target organisms • The possibility that the modified plant could persist longer in the environment or invade new habitats
The likelihood and consequences of the potential spread of newly introduced traits to related plants
Potential impacts on biodiversity These environmental safety concerns are not unique to plants produced using biotechnology and are also important when evaluating new varieties produced through convention al plant breeding.
For example, the biodiversity of tropical rainforests or other ecologically sensitive areas can only be maintained if these natural ecosystems are not destroyed because of the expansion of the agricultural land base. Biotech crops can alleviate pressure to expand agricultural areas by increasing yields with improved pest resistance and increased tolerance to drought or saline soil conditions. In Hebei province of China, bio diversity of insects appears to have been enhanced by the adoption of Bt cotton.

Although biotechnology broadens the scope of genetic changes that can be introduced into plants used for food, it does not inherently result in foods that are less safe than those produced by other techniques. This means that previously established principles for assessing food safety still apply for products of biotechnology. Moreover, these products can be judged on their individual safety, allergenicity, toxicity and nutrition rather than their method of production.

The safety assessment of biotech foods is based on the principle that they can be compared with traditional foods that have an established history of safe use.

This comparison can be based on an examination of the same risks that have been established for traditional foods, keeping in mind that many conventional foods may present specific risks depending on conditions of processing, or to individuals within a population. The intent of this comparative approach is to establish whether the new food is "as safe as" its convention al counterpart.

International discussion and expert consultations have resulted in a consensus on the specific safety issues that should be considered when evaluating these new foods. They include the following:

The Parent Plant: Knowledge of the biology of the plant and its history of safe use as a food are important for understanding the natural range and variation of key nutrition al components, such as vitamins and minerals; naturally occurring toxicants; anti-nutrients; and potential allergens.
The Gene Source: Information about the natural history of the source organism of a new gene is important in assessing whether it could be a potential source of allergens or toxins.
Nutrition: All plant breeding methods have the potential to change the nutritional value of plants or to lead to unexpected changes in levels of natural toxicants or anti-nutrients. Food safety assessments take into account the potential for any change in nutritional composition, especially in key components that have a significant impact on the diet. Laboratory analyses are used to compare the profile of the new plant with its conventional counterpart for constituents such as protein, fat, fibre, micronutrients, amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins, toxins and anti-nutrients.

Allergens: The potential of accidentally introducing a new allergen (a protein that causes an allergic re action) into a food is an important safety concern. Fortunately, food allergens have common characteristic s, such as remaining stable during digestion and food processing, and they are usually abundant in foods. Internationally accepted approaches for evaluating allergenicity have been established and none of the new proteins present in biotech foods share the properties of allergens.
Toxins: The possibility that new toxins ma y have been introduced into a food is also tested by com paring an y newly produced protein s with known protein toxin s u sing laboratory analyses and animal studies.
Like allergens, protein toxins have very well characterized properties, which are not shared by any of the new proteins in biotech foods.

In assessing these safety issues, the processed version of the food and its impact on specific population subgroups, such as infants or the elderly, is also evaluated.

See... How are Biotech Crops & Foods Assessed for Safety ?U.S. Agency for International Development, Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project II, and the Program for Biosafety Systems
PBS & ABSPII are supported by the United States Agency for International Development

http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/biotech/factsheets/biotechsafety.pdf

2013 SGVJournal. Developed and Designed by Charlene on Green

Top Desktop version